Companies weigh pros, cons of autoclaving, bioleaching

Both processes eliminate toxic gas emissions, convert sulphur as well as arsenic into more stable compounds and discharge them into tailings ponds on site. While autoclaving is generally more expensive, capital and operating costs of either process depend on the...

By continuing to browse you agree to our use of cookies. To learn more, click more information

Dear user, please be aware that we use cookies to help users navigate our website content and to help us understand how we can improve the user experience. If you have ideas for how we can improve our services, we’d love to hear from you. Click here to email us. By continuing to browse you agree to our use of cookies. Please see our Privacy & Cookie Usage Policy to learn more.

Close