Tough conditions for rough diamonds

A rough diamond at the Harry Oppenheimer House in South Africa. Photo by Anglo AmericanA rough diamond at the Harry Oppenheimer House in South Africa. Photo by Anglo American

Anglo American (AAL-L, AAUKY-Q) reported diamond production fell in the second quarter ended June 30 by 11% to 7.2 million carats because of market conditions and a focus on planned maintenance and waste stripping, while De Beers, in which Anglo American holds a 45% stake, reported profits for the first half of 2012 fell sharply year-on-year.

Softness in the diamond market sent De Beers’ first-half profit before finance charges and tax down to US$502 million from US$1 billion in the year-ago period. Total sales slid 14% to US$3.3 billion from US$3.9 billion and diamond production dropped to 13.4 million carats, compared with 15.5 million carats in the first half of 2011.

The company forecasts it could produce between 28 million and 30 million carats this year, a slight drop from the 31.3 million carats it produced last year.

Philippe Mellier, De Beers’ chief executive, told news agency reporters that the company is allowing sightholders — buyers of rough diamonds, such as cutting and polishing centres — to defer up to half their diamond purchases until March 2013.  

But some analysts question the move, even in current tough market conditions. Charles Wyndham, founder of polishedprices.com in the U.K., says in a telephone interview that the decision raises questions about whether it is really a sale at the price it claims to be, and argues it would be much better for De Beers not to sell the goods forward under the circumstances.

“Presumably they have to sell the goods as they have their own pressures. But in the cold light of day, if you were selling Mars candy bars and you said to your customers, ‘you can buy two tonnes now, but you can defer one tonne of it until next March at today’s price,’ what would you think?”

He adds that “the market is not good, to put it mildly. De Beers’ figures are obviously flattered because they haven’t dropped their prices in relation to market conditions. They’ve knocked a few percent off here and there — maybe 3% — but that’s all . . . now if they hold the line, and if they can fill the volume they need to fill, then fine. But history would tend to suggest that even when the company had a much bigger market share, they just couldn’t buck the trend.”

Wyndham says that while the gap between rough and polished prices is too wide, and must come down, it is slowly narrowing. “You can’t have prices for rough diamonds charging ahead of polished prices forever, it’s not logical,” he explains. “It just can’t go on . . . it has to come somewhere between a sensible ballpark.”

Considering the general economic malaise and what’s happening in Europe, he says, polished prices have not performed all that badly. “All luxury goods have had a hard time, and in relation to that, diamonds are probably not doing that badly . . . people are still getting married. As long as you don’t have a complete meltdown in Europe — I’m not that pessimistic, but that’s a huge caveat.”

Edward Sterck of BMO Capital Markets in London noted that De Beers sees moderate growth in global polished diamond sales in 2012, mainly supported by demand from the U.S., China, Japan and Gulf markets, but that the company “expects trading conditions for rough diamonds to remain challenging in the second half of 2012.”

He pointed out that De Beers’ analysis of market conditions and its outlook in the second half of the year is in-line with BMO Research’s expectations for “subdued prices in 2012, followed by a return to growth in 2013.”

Sterck also reported that Anglo American’s decision last year to buy an additional 40% stake in De Beers from the Oppenheimer family is expected to close in the current quarter. The sale has received regulatory approval and will bring Anglo American’s interest in De Beers to 85%.

Print

Be the first to comment on "Tough conditions for rough diamonds"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


By continuing to browse you agree to our use of cookies. To learn more, click more information

Dear user, please be aware that we use cookies to help users navigate our website content and to help us understand how we can improve the user experience. If you have ideas for how we can improve our services, we’d love to hear from you. Click here to email us. By continuing to browse you agree to our use of cookies. Please see our Privacy & Cookie Usage Policy to learn more.

Close