Rio Tinto to spend US$1B to reach zero emissions

Rio Tinto (NYSE: RIO; LSE: RIO) will spend $1 billion over the next five years to reduce its carbon footprint and have net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, but some analysts say the announcement is a minor step towards helping the mining industry achieve climate goals.

Delivering full-year results for 2019, in which the company recorded its highest profit in eight years, CEO Jean-Sébastien Jacques said the world has got to a point where it is necessary to sacrifice growth to meet climate targets.

“The challenge for the world, and for the resources industry, is to continue the focus on poverty reduction and wealth creation, while delivering climate action,” Jacques said. “This will require complex trade-offs.”

Rio’s boss, at the helm since 2016, said that lower consumption, growth and returns are some of the sacrifices consumers, governments and shareholders must all be willing to make. This is especially true for the natural resources industry, which has come under increasing pressure to curb emissions.

“There are no easy answers,” Jacques told investors. “There is no clear pathway right now for the world to get to net zero emissions by 2050. The ambition is clear but the pathway is not.”

For Julian Kettle, Wood Mackenzie vice chairman of metals and mining, Rio’s plans to decarbonize its globe-spanning operations are a “small but significant” step in the right direction.

“Setting Rio Tinto’s US$1 billion in context, this represents just 16% of the dividend it distributed in 2019, or just under 5% of its reported EBITDA of $21.2bn for the same year,” Kettle said.

“Put another way, on a 100% basis, Rio Tinto reported iron ore production of 327 million tonnes in 2019. A US$1 billion dollar green investment, while laudable, could be funded by a 30c/tonne rise in the iron ore price.

“The industry needs to do much more,” he noted.

The no emissions goal would be easier to achieve for Rio Tinto than other global miners, such as rival BHP (NYSE: BHP; LSE: BHP), because the world’s second-largest mining company does not mine coal or oil.

Unlike BHP, however, Rio has not set a target to reduce so-called “Scope 3” emissions — those produced when customers burn or process a company’s raw materials.

The company argues any targets on its Scope 3 emissions would be impossible to meet because it has no control over how steelmakers use the iron ore it mines.

Last year, Rio inked a preliminary deal with China’s largest steel producer, Baowu Steel Group, to develop new ways to cut carbon emissions along the supply chain.

Steelmaking is a highly polluting industry that involves using coking coal, which is responsible for up to 9% of global greenhouse emissions.

The group’s results, the best underlying earnings since 2011, were partially clouded by warnings of the effect the coronavirus epidemic may have in the business, as more supply chain disruptions and potential delays to projects in Australia are expected.

Rio said its products were continuing to reach customers, but it was seeking ways to adjust to the impact of the Covid-19 virus on global demand for commodities in the months to come.

“The next six months could bring some challenges,” Jacques said. “Today, our iron ore books are full, but we are likely to see some short-term impacts.”

China is one of Rio Tinto’s main customers. The company is anticipating an impact in its iron ore shipments to the regions during the first quarter.

— This article first appeared in our sister publication, MINING.com. The Northern Miner and MINING.com are part of the Glacier Resource Innovation Group. The original article  can be seen here:  https://www.mining.com/rio-tintos-1bn-spend-to-reach-zero-emissions-not-enough-analysts/