Queenstake’s losses narrow

QUEENSTAKE RESOURCESTwo underground miners conduct production drilling underground at the Jerritt Canyon mining complex in Nevada. Owner Queenstake Resources posted a net loss of US$19.7 million in 2005 on production from Jerritt Canyon, a slight improvement over 2004.

QUEENSTAKE RESOURCES

Two underground miners conduct production drilling underground at the Jerritt Canyon mining complex in Nevada. Owner Queenstake Resources posted a net loss of US$19.7 million in 2005 on production from Jerritt Canyon, a slight improvement over 2004.

Vancouver — Staying on track with its redevelopment plan, Queenstake Resources (QRL-T, QEE-X) reported 2005 gold production of just over 204,000 oz. from its Jerritt Canyon operations in northeastern Nevada.

Last year’s output came in at a cash operating cost of US$386 per oz., 15% higher than 2004’s average cost of US$336 per oz. on production of 243,333 oz.

Fourth-quarter 2005 figures show 45,555 oz. produced at US$413 per oz. compared with 60,384 oz. at US$336 per oz. for the corresponding period of the previous year. The drop in comparative output reflects Queenstake’s redevelopment plan, implemented in mid-2005 when it scaled back to run just one of its two ore-roasters, to match actual mining rates. Winter conditions typically also have an adverse effect on operations and gold production.

The company posted a net loss of US$19.7 million in 2005, a slight improvement over the US$22.1-million loss in 2004. Elevated fuel, energy and commodity prices all contributed to the loss, along with lower gold production and certain corporate charges. The latest fourth-quarter figures indicate that the redevelopment initiative is bearing fruit, with the net loss dropping to US$2.6 million versus US$4.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2004.

Queenstake’s balance sheet showed a positive working capital of US$4.5 million at year-end, compared with a deficiency of US$9.4 million in 2004.

Operations saw just over 1 million tonnes of ore processed in 2005, averaging 7.5 grams gold per tonne, down from the 1.18 million tonnes grading 7.2 grams gold processed in 2004. Latest fourth-quarter statistics show 192,000 tonnes of ore processed at 8.6 grams gold, falling in line with Queenstake’s plan of dropping the mining rate and targeting higher-grade ore, compared to the 2004 fourth-quarter operational figures of 301,000 tonnes at 7.2 grams gold.

The company projects 2006 Jerritt Canyon gold production to come in at similar levels to 2005, at between 200,000 and 220,000 oz., with operating costs similar to the US$413 per oz. realized in the fourth quarter.

Newmont investment

In unison with its year-end and fourth-quarter report, Queenstake landed significant market attention by announcing a planned $10-million investment by Newmont Mining (NMC-T, NEM-N) subsidiary, Newmont Canada.

The agreement will have Newmont purchasing 28.51 million Queenstake shares at 41 apiece, and receiving warrants exercisable for up to an additional 28.51 million shares at 55 apiece for four years. The initial share position will give the major a 4.9% interest in Queenstake, with the stake rising to 8.5% should it exercise all the warrants. Newmont also retains participatory rights in any equity financings over the next two years to maintain its shareholding percentage.

Under the agreement, Newmont will also transfer three of its Nevada exploration projects to Queenstake, including the Shwin Ranch gold project in the Cortez-Battle Mountain trend.

A Newmont affiliate will sell concentrates and ore from certain Nevada operations to Queenstake for processing at the Jerritt Canyon roasting and milling facility. The contract will see at least 450,000 tonnes annually purchased by Queenstake over the initial two years and may continue for an additional three years, providing there is spare processing capacity.

Shares of Queenstake soared on the news, trading up 41% to close at a more than 15-month high of 50 apiece on volume of almost 43 million.

Print

Be the first to comment on "Queenstake’s losses narrow"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


By continuing to browse you agree to our use of cookies. To learn more, click more information

Dear user, please be aware that we use cookies to help users navigate our website content and to help us understand how we can improve the user experience. If you have ideas for how we can improve our services, we’d love to hear from you. Click here to email us. By continuing to browse you agree to our use of cookies. Please see our Privacy & Cookie Usage Policy to learn more.

Close