Australia must weigh climate change in mine approvals, court says

The Vickery open-pit coal mine in Australia. Image courtesy of Whitehaven Coal.

A federal court in Australia has ruled that the government of Australia must consider the risks carbon dioxide emissions pose to young people when approving new coal mines or expansions to existing ones.

The case, brought by eight students and an octogenarian nun, centred on Whitehaven Coal’s planned expansion of an operation in New South Wales. The project aims at producing as much as 10 million tonnes a year of mostly metallurgical coal, used in steel-making.

While Judge Mordy Bromberg had dismissed the original claim seeking to stop expansion of coal mine operations, the July 8 judgement could set a precedent for all fossil fuel projects in Australia, the world’s second-largest coal exporter by volume.

Climate advocates hailed the decision, adding there should be “no moral, legal or rational way” that Sussan Ley, Australia’s minister of the environment, could now approve Whitehaven’s expansion of its Vickery coal mine.

They noted Bromberg’s verdict will have implications beyond coal as the judgement specifies a duty of care in relation to “emissions of carbon dioxide into the Earth’s atmosphere.” That means it could apply to any project with a significant emissions footprint that required Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act approval.

Tania Constable, the chief executive of the Minerals Council of Australia, backed the Vickery project, which could still be approved by Minister Ley.

“Projects like these are a vital part of Australian mining, which continues to produce some of the best quality raw materials in the world enabling economic development and rising living standards abroad while supporting jobs and communities at home,” she said in a statement.

Lawyer David Barnden, who represented the students, said the ruling brings hope and anticipation of “a better, and responsible decision making by government.”  He added the ramifications for the minister are now very clear.

Whitehaven Coal said it had nothing to add to its previous statement, issued in May, as “today’s orders really just formalize the previous outcome.”

Shares in the miner dropped after the ruling, closing 2.7% lower in Sydney at A$2 each.

Currently there are about 1,800 climate litigations pending around the world, according to Columbia Law School’s Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. A recent ruling in The Hague ordered Royal Dutch Shell to cut emissions faster than planned.

The federal court’s ruling in Australia comes on the heels of a report showing that emissions from coal mined in the country, but exported and burned overseas, were almost double the nation’s domestic greenhouse gas footprint in 2020.

The study by energy industry consultancy group Kayrros showed the Bowen Basin, which straddles the border between the states of New South Wales and Queensland, released an average of 1.6 million tonnes a year of methane in 2019 and 2020.

Australia’s total emissions in 2020 were 499 million tonnes, government data shows. The government is resisting international pressure to commit to net zero emissions by 2050 and has ruled out charging polluters by setting a price on carbon.

Print

Be the first to comment on "Australia must weigh climate change in mine approvals, court says"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


By continuing to browse you agree to our use of cookies. To learn more, click more information

Dear user, please be aware that we use cookies to help users navigate our website content and to help us understand how we can improve the user experience. If you have ideas for how we can improve our services, we’d love to hear from you. Click here to email us. By continuing to browse you agree to our use of cookies. Please see our Privacy & Cookie Usage Policy to learn more.

Close