Court dismisses McKenzie-Tagish claim to Eskay

The Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed a motion by Tagish Resources (VSE) and Ken McKenzie to quash an Inspection Report prepared by the Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources which recommended the complaint against the TOK 3-6 claims be dismissed. The TOK 3-6 claims cover the bulk of the reserves on the rich Eskay Creek deposit, north of Stewart, B.C. The now-famous deposit is jointly owned by Prime Resources (VSE) and Stikine Resources (VSE).

The complaint against the TOK 3-6 claims alleged that the claims were invalid because of a gap between the TOK 1 and 2 claims and the TOK 3 and 4 claims.

The Court’s decision also secures ownership of a portion of the claim gap held by Adrian Resources (VSE). A recent calculation of reserves on the gap outlined 77,500 tons grading 1.27 oz. gold and 34.08 oz. silver per ton at a 0.25-oz.-per-ton cutoff grade.

Chet Idziszek, senior vice- president of exploration for Prime, said the Court’s ruling was generally expected and was at a loss to explain the increase in Adrian’s share price prior to the decision.

Adrian ran up from the $1.40 level to a high of $1.87 per share.


Print


 

Republish this article

Be the first to comment on "Court dismisses McKenzie-Tagish claim to Eskay"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


By continuing to browse you agree to our use of cookies. To learn more, click more information

Dear user, please be aware that we use cookies to help users navigate our website content and to help us understand how we can improve the user experience. If you have ideas for how we can improve our services, we’d love to hear from you. Click here to email us. By continuing to browse you agree to our use of cookies. Please see our Privacy & Cookie Usage Policy to learn more.

Close